Continue on TOI App
Open App
OPEN APP

Union Budget 2019: Why salaried Indians need a big hike in standard deduction

While businessmen and consultants can claim exemptions against al... Read More
NEW DELHI: The income-tax rules seem skewed against salaried employees. While businessmen and consultants can claim exemptions against all kinds of expenses every month, for salaried employees, tax is deducted at source by the employer, which significantly lowers the take-home pay.


Is there a way to bring about a level playing field? A good way forward is by increasing

standard deduction

— not by a token amount, but substantially. Standard deduction is the amount that gets subtracted from your taxable income.

Standard deduction was reintroduced by the

Finance Act

2018 (it was last available for the financial year 2004-05). However, this standard deduction of Rs 40,000 subsumed the tax-exempt transport allowance — an annual figure of Rs 19,200 and the medical reimbursement that could be claimed up to Rs 15,000. In short, the end benefit was just an annual incremental net reduction in taxable income of Rs 5,800.

Although the standard deduction was further increased to Rs 50,000 in the 2019 interim budget for the current financial year, this still seems very inadequate if you look at the exemptions available to a consultant.

While the key exempt allowances — travel and medical reimbursement — no longer exist, the limits of the few that are still there have not been revised for years and remain unadjusted for rising inflation. For instance, the limits for children’s education allowance (Rs 100 per month per child, up to two children) and hostel allowance (Rs 300 per month per child, up to two children) were last revised almost two decades ago.

Now, look at what a consultant (engineer, doctor, lawyer etc) pays. If her gross receipts do not exceed Rs 50 lakh, she can opt for presumptive taxation and offer only 50% (or higher) of such gross receipts as taxable income.

In other words, 50% of the gross receipts can be claimed as expenses. If, the consultant wishes to claim a higher expenditure (that is, more than 50% of the gross receipts), it is mandatory to have the accounts audited.

Presumptive taxation benefit is not available if the gross receipts exceed Rs 50 lakh. In that case, the actual expenses as per the audited accounts are allowed as a deduction.

While the presumptive tax has really helped smaller and medium-sized taxpayers, it has resulted in stark disparity between salaried employees and consultants with the same income. This is reflected in a case study (I-T rates applicable for the financial year 2018-19 have been used in the illustration — see graphic).



Both the salaried employee and the consultant earn the same gross income (salary and gross fees) of Rs 30 lakh. The end result is horribly skewed against the salaried employee who pays Rs 6.73 lakh in taxes, while the consultant pays only Rs 2.18 lakh — that’s less than a third of the salaried employee’s tax liability. So, while both earn Rs 30 lakh, the salaried employee ends up paying Rs 4.55 lakh more in taxes.

Some countries like

Denmark

and South Korea provide deductions from salary income based on a certain percentage/income levels. In Denmark (for FY 2018), a salaried individual was eligible for a deduction of 9.5% of salary income, subject to a maximum of (Danish Krone) DKK 34,300. The minimum salary required to be eligible for it was DKK 361,053.

The finance minister, in the forthcoming budget could also consider something similar. This standard deduction could vary with salary levels, subject to a maximum cap. It may be fairer, especially for those salaried earners falling in the higher tax slabs.

(Source: EY)

Stay ahead in business with The Times of India. Check out Financial Calculators like SIP, PPF, FD, NPS and Mutual Fund Calculators.
Top Comment
gajanan pandit
1977 days ago
A Builder purchases 1000 sqm land in Goa for 1.5 cr.Economics of Government :Land purchase Stamp duty Registration is 8 % = 8,00,000/-Construction cost for 1000sqm SBA is 1300 × 20,000 = 2.6 crSanctioned plan :Cost for Architect plan @3% ( 7.8 lac) RCC @2% (5.2 lac) of construction cost infrastructure tax @200sqm (2.6 lac) overheads which is =Land cost 1.5 crStamp paper 8 lacPlan 7.8 lacRCC 5.2 lacTax 2.6 lacMis 5 lacTotal = 1.8 crBuilder has 13 apartments each 100sqmEach costing 45 lacsFlat Purchaser pays 45 lac GST Stamp Duty RegistrationGST 5.6 lacSD 1.35 lacReg 90 thousandBuilder pays 1% VAT on 45 lacTotal 8.3 lacPer apartment sale government makes 8.3 lacs13 apartments × 8.3 lacs = 1.8 crBuilder had already paid ₹ 45 lacIncome tax for land purchase amount of 1.5 Cr.Wait,Land owner who sold land to builder paid approx 10 lac for capital gain to Government.All in this process after construction work was completed Builder earned profitSale of 13 apartments13 × 45 lac = 5.85 crsCost of construction1300 × 20000 = 2.6 crLand costArchitect RCC etc = 1.8 crTotal. = 4.4Revenue = 5.85Profit = 1.45 crAfter tax 1.45 cr - 30% = 1 crFinal economics:Builder earned 1 cr after working for 3 years selling off all his 13 units.Government earnedFrom vendor 10 lacFrom 13 unit sale by adding GST, VAT, Stamp Duty, Registeration 1.8crFrom builder as IT 48 lacsTotal 10 lac 1.8 cr 48 lacsGovernment earns 2.38 cr on zero investmentIn the minds of public builders are looting People.This is economics of current situationWait..........Height of all,Profession tax , fringe benefit tax of staff , free gifts to Govt officials... I am already tired of calculations.Just remember Govt is your partner holding more than 75% shares without any investment.This the ground reality of our tax structure .
Continue Reading
Follow Us On Social Media
end of article
More Trending Stories
Visual Stories
More Visual Stories
UP NEXT
Do Not Sell Or Share My Personal Information