Operation Sindoor impact: Why Nifty, Sensex are unlikely to be hit too much - here’s how markets have reacted in the past on India-Pakistan tensions

Operation Sindoor impact: Market reactions to Indo-Pak military tensions have historically been measured. During past confrontations between the two nations since 1999, the Nifty 50 has typically experienced modest declines of approximately 5%, followed by robust recoveries yielding double-digit gains within six months. Despite border tensions, financial markets have maintained their focus on core economic indicators.

According to an ET analysis, this pattern is being observed again following India's coordinated precision strikes against nine terrorist locations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), responding to the Pahalgam terror incident that resulted in 26 civilian casualties.

Operation Sindoor has had minimal impact on Indian stock markets. The Nifty and Sensex recovered quickly after a brief initial decline, remaining focused on capital flows and economic fundamentals.

This stability reflects established patterns.

Also Read | Operation Sindoor impact: Pakistan stock market crashes 5% after India strikes Pakistan terrorist camps

Analysis of major conflicts - the Kargil War (1999), Parliament attack (2001), the 26/11 Mumbai terror strikes (2008), Uri surgical strikes (2016) and Balakot airstrikes (2019) - shows the Nifty's average maximum decline was merely 5.27%, falling short of correction levels.

Data from Bajaj Broking quoted by ET indicates positive six-month returns in four out of five instances, with particularly strong recoveries exceeding 35% following the 1999 and 2008 events.

Markets tend to remain stable during geopolitical tensions because investors typically focus on future prospects. Unless conflicts intensify into full-scale warfare or affect fundamental economic indicators such as trade, inflation, currency or capital movements, markets generally disregard temporary disturbances.

"Even in the event of a substantial escalation, we believe the Nifty 50 is unlikely to correct more than 5–10%," said Anand Rathi, highlighting how current global risk appetite remains resilient. "Investors who have any equity gap in the portfolio should invest now, aligning to the 65:35:20 strategic allocation."

Also Read | Real economic blow to Pakistan! India chokes $500 million Pakistani goods entering it via third countries

Historically, the Parliament attack in 2001 stands out as the most significant anomaly, carrying substantial international implications. It occurred shortly after the September 11 attacks, when global markets were uncertain and risk-averse behaviour prevailed across asset categories. The situation extended beyond South Asia. The 2008 Mumbai attacks coincided with the global financial crisis, creating a pessimistic market environment, the report said.

However, during incidents like Kargil (1999) and Balakot (2019), despite heightened tensions, these situations remained contained. Markets viewed these events primarily as political or strategic developments rather than economic disruptions.

Market Resilience in Current Times
"What stands out in Operation Sindoor is its focused and non-escalatory nature," noted Dr. V.K. Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist at Geojit. "The market had already discounted the Indian strike. What's driving resilience is the Rs 43,940 crore in FII flows over 14 days. That's where the real support lies."

The current market structure shows notable differences. Individual investors demonstrate increased sophistication, whilst domestic institutions maintain substantial cash reserves. Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs), traditionally cautious during border tensions, now show preference for Indian large-cap companies, anticipating growth opportunities in a stagnant global environment.

"India's macroeconomic fundamentals remain robust," observed Devarsh Vakil, Head of Prime Research at HDFC Securities. "Cash-rich mutual funds and steady FII buying are buffering our markets from short-term shocks."

The current scenario would only alter significantly if the situation escalates to warfare, triggers sanctions, or causes economic disruption. Present indicators suggest this represents a buying opportunity rather than a signal to sell, say experts.

Historical patterns indicate that market trajectories remain positive despite geopolitical tensions.