This story is from February 14, 2017
No, I have not withdrawn my concerns, Narayana Murthy says
BENGALURU/MUMBAI: Not long after a news wire service reported on Monday morning that N R Narayana Murthy was "calling off his fight with the board of Infosys", he issued a statement saying, "No, I have not withdrawn my concerns."
In what has been interpreted by many as at least a "walking back", if not a U-turn, the Infosys co-founder said, "They (his concerns) have to be addressed properly by the board and full transparency should be displayed and people responsible for it should become accountable... I hope they take corrective action soon and improve governance for a better future for the company."
In a clear indication that he expected the board to take him seriously and without delay, Murthy said, "Good leadership demands that they listen to all concerned shareholders, re-evaluate their decision and take corrective action."
This appeared to be somewhat less conciliatory than what he had earlier told
However, a person who knows both sides sought to play down the perception that Murthy had reverted to his earlier 'hardline' position. "The difference between the two statements of Murthy was more in the nuancing than anything else. In both, he made it clear that the issues raised by him need to be sorted out - just that he's now leaving it to the board to do it and he doesn't want to be confrontational," this person said.
He drew attention to Murthy's subsequent statement referring to the board as "good intentioned people of high integrity...but obviously being human even good people sometimes make mistakes, this is one such case".
In an interview to TOI last Thursday , Murthy had said he was "distressed at what is happening in Infosys" and voiced concerns over a fall in the quality of board governance and the huge severance packages offered to a chief financial officer and another senior executive. And, almost a year ago, he and a number of Infosys co-founders had abstained from voting on a resolution to sharply increase CEO Vishal Sikka's compensation package (although much of it was tied up to very steep performance targets).
In a clear indication that he expected the board to take him seriously and without delay, Murthy said, "Good leadership demands that they listen to all concerned shareholders, re-evaluate their decision and take corrective action."
This appeared to be somewhat less conciliatory than what he had earlier told
Bloomberg
when asked if the row was over: "Yes, I think so.The reality is that these things happen. It is a good idea not to unnecessarily muddy it up further... Let me stop. I have made a point, paying such large sums of money is confusing. Now they have to sort it out...I felt that I don't want it to snowball. I don't have the time. Neither should the board and the management be spending time on it." He added he was confident the company would deal with his concerns about corporate governance.However, a person who knows both sides sought to play down the perception that Murthy had reverted to his earlier 'hardline' position. "The difference between the two statements of Murthy was more in the nuancing than anything else. In both, he made it clear that the issues raised by him need to be sorted out - just that he's now leaving it to the board to do it and he doesn't want to be confrontational," this person said.
He drew attention to Murthy's subsequent statement referring to the board as "good intentioned people of high integrity...but obviously being human even good people sometimes make mistakes, this is one such case".
In an interview to TOI last Thursday , Murthy had said he was "distressed at what is happening in Infosys" and voiced concerns over a fall in the quality of board governance and the huge severance packages offered to a chief financial officer and another senior executive. And, almost a year ago, he and a number of Infosys co-founders had abstained from voting on a resolution to sharply increase CEO Vishal Sikka's compensation package (although much of it was tied up to very steep performance targets).
Top Comment
som_das
2851 days ago
It about buy back. Rest is building pressure on current mgmt to bow down. Corporate goverance is lip service.Read allPost comment
Popular from Business
- PAN 2.0: Why you should apply for new PAN Card with QR code - top 5 benefits explained
- ‘Investing in India is profitable’: Putin heaps praises on PM Modi; says Russia ready to set up manufacturing operations in India
- PAN 2.0 for free! How to get PAN Card with QR code with address update online; step-by-step guide
- Avoiding ATM fake shutter fraud: Why some ATMs will now retract cash as per RBI mandate
- 'Doubt on credibility': IndiGo dismisses low ranking in global survey
end of article
Trending Stories
- UPI Lite new rules 2024: RBI increases UPI Lite wallet, transaction limits - here's what UPI users should know
- Airbus cuts over 2,000 jobs amidst competition from Elon Musk's Starlink
- ‘Investing in India is profitable’: Putin heaps praises on PM Modi; says Russia ready to set up manufacturing operations in India
- Great news! IIT graduates see rise in high-paying salary offers based in India; packages comparable to international salaries
- PAN 2.0: With PAN Card going digital, will you need a physical PAN for KYC, ID proof?
- Stock market today: BSE Sensex reclaims 81,000; Nifty50 above 24,500
- H-1B visa cap for FY 2025 reached! What applicants for US H-1B visa program should check
Visual Stories
- NEET UG 2024 result awaited: Top 10 NIRF-ranked medical colleges of India
- 7 New Expected Bullet Train Routes in India
- 10 Upcoming High-Speed Expressways That Will Change Highway Travel In India
- 8 Transformational Indian Railways Projects You Shouldn’t Miss
- Why Sensex, Nifty50 Hit New Highs, M-Cap At $5 Trillion: Top Reasons
UP NEXT